
We have dozens of ethics articles
that can be accessed through our site map.

Disclaimer:
Information contained in pages and articles on this site
provides general information and does not provide legal advice on any specific
legal matter or factual situation. This information is not intended to create or
provide a lawyer-client relationship. It is not legal advice. Readers should not
act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Use of this site
does not create an attorney - client relationship, even if you provide
information to us by any means including using a contact form on this site.
Read full
Disclaimers and Legal Notices.
© Copyright
Leonard H. Bucklin 2000 to 2011. All rights
reserved. No copying or distribution of this
material may be made without the express written consent of the copyright
holder. For more information -
Read
full Legal Notices.
|
What is an ethicist?
(It's not a philosopher who specialized in ethics.)
An ethicist is one whose judgment on ethics and ethical codes
has come to be trusted by a specific community, and (importantly) is
expressed in some way that makes it possible for others to mimic or
approximate that judgment.
Indeed, modern ethicists take the view that ethics is only
about resolving actual problems and actual disputes, and that theories
of ethics that are not useful in resolving real-world problems are not
useful.
A thoughtful consideration of the role of the clinical
(health care) ethicist has been done by David Sontag at Are clinical
ethics consultants in danger? An analysis of the potential legal liability
of individual clinical ethicists, Univ. of Penn. Law Review
(December 01, 2002). Much of what he says applies to ethicists in all
fields of human endeavor, including business or charitable organizations.
When most ethicists are called for a consultation on an
ethics problem by a group, they try to achieve a morally acceptable
consensus result. If the views of the ethics consultant differs from the
consensus view of the group requesting the consultation, the
consultant states the developed consensus view, his/her own dissenting
view and the arguments in support of each position.
Back to the page on using an ethicist in your ethics committee.
|